1 はじめに
2 範囲と方法論
2.1 本調査の目的
2.2 利害関係者
2.3 データソース
2.3.1 一次ソース
2.3.2 二次ソース
2.4 市場推定
2.4.1 ボトムアップアプローチ
2.4.2 トップダウンアプローチ
2.5 予測方法論
3 エグゼクティブサマリー
4 はじめに
4.1 概要
4.2 主要産業動向
5 世界の医療用使い捨て器具再処理市場
5.1 市場概要
5.2 市場実績
5.3 COVID-19 の影響
5.4 市場予測
6 機器タイプ別の市場内訳
6.1 クラスI機器
6.1.1 市場動向
6.1.2 主なセグメント
6.1.2.1 腹腔鏡用鉗子
6.1.2.2 メス
6.1.2.3 血管結紮器
6.1.2.4 その他のクラスI機器
6.1.3 市場予測
6.2 クラスII機器
6.2.1 市場動向
6.2.2 主なセグメント
6.2.2.1 パルスオキシメーターセンサー
6.2.2.2 逐次圧迫スリーブ
6.2.2.3 カテーテルおよびガイドワイヤー
6.2.2.4 その他のクラスII機器
6.2.3 市場予測
7 用途別市場
7.1 一般外科
7.1.1 市場動向
7.1.2 市場予測
7.2 麻酔
7.2.1 市場動向
7.2.2 市場予測
7.3 関節鏡視下手術および整形外科手術
7.3.1 市場動向
7.3.2 市場予測
7.4 循環器科
7.4.1 市場動向
7.4.2 市場予測
7.5 消化器科
7.5.1 市場動向
7.5.2 市場予測
7.6 婦人科
7.6.1 市場動向
7.6.2 市場予測
7.7 泌尿器科
7.7.1 市場動向
7.7.2 市場予測
7.8 その他
7.8.1 市場動向
7.8.2 市場予測
8 エンドユーザー別市場内訳
8.1 病院
8.1.1 市場動向
8.1.2 市場予測
8.2 外来外科センター
8.2.1 市場動向
8.2.2 市場予測
8.3 その他
8.3.1 市場動向
8.3.2 市場予測
9 地域別市場内訳
9.1 北米
9.1.1 米国
9.1.1.1 市場動向
9.1.1.2 市場予測
9.1.2 カナダ
9.1.2.1 市場動向
9.1.2.2 市場予測
9.2 アジア太平洋地域
9.2.1 中国
9.2.1.1 市場動向
9.2.1.2 市場予測
9.2.2 日本
9.2.2.1 市場動向
9.2.2.2 市場予測
9.2.3 インド
9.2.3.1 市場動向
9.2.3.2 市場予測
9.2.4 韓国
9.2.4.1 市場動向
9.2.4.2 市場予測
9.2.5 オーストラリア
9.2.5.1 市場動向
9.2.5.2 市場予測
9.2.6 インドネシア
9.2.6.1 市場動向
9.2.6.2 市場予測
9.2.7 その他
9.2.7.1 市場動向
9.2.7.2 市場予測
9.3 欧州
9.3.1 ドイツ
9.3.1.1 市場動向
9.3.1.2 市場予測
9.3.2 フランス
9.3.2.1 市場動向
9.3.2.2 市場予測
9.3.3 英国
9.3.3.1 市場動向
9.3.3.2 市場予測
9.3.4 イタリア
9.3.4.1 市場動向
9.3.4.2 市場予測
9.3.5 スペイン
9.3.5.1 市場動向
9.3.5.2 市場予測
9.3.6 ロシア
9.3.6.1 市場動向
9.3.6.2 市場予測
9.3.7 その他
9.3.7.1 市場動向
9.3.7.2 市場予測
9.4 ラテンアメリカ
9.4.1 ブラジル
9.4.1.1 市場動向
9.4.1.2 市場予測
9.4.2 メキシコ
9.4.2.1 市場動向
9.4.2.2 市場予測
9.4.3 その他
9.4.3.1 市場動向
9.4.3.2 市場予測
9.5 中東およびアフリカ
9.5.1 市場動向
9.5.2 国別の市場内訳
9.5.3 市場予測
10 SWOT分析
10.1 概要
10.2 強み
10.3 弱み
10.4 機会
10.5 脅威
11 バリューチェーン分析
12 ポーターのファイブフォース分析
12.1 概要
12.2 買い手の交渉力
12.3 売り手の交渉力
12.4 競争の度合い
12.5 新規参入の脅威
12.6 代替品の脅威
13 価格分析
14 競合状況
14.1 市場構造
14.2 主要企業
14.3 主要企業のプロフィール
14.3.1 Arjo Inc.
14.3.1.1 企業概要
14.3.1.2 製品ポートフォリオ
14.3.2 Innovative Health
14.3.2.1 企業概要
14.3.2.2 製品ポートフォリオ
14.3.3 ジョンソン・エンド・ジョンソン
14.3.3.1 企業概要
14.3.3.2 製品ポートフォリオ
14.3.3.3 財務
14.3.3.4 SWOT分析
14.3.4 メドライン・インダストリーズLP
14.3.4.1 企業概要
14.3.4.2 製品ポートフォリオ
14.3.4.3 SWOT分析
14.3.5 NEScientific Inc.
14.3.5.1 企業概要
14.3.5.2 製品ポートフォリオ
14.3.6 Steripro Canada
14.3.6.1 企業概要
14.3.6.2 製品ポートフォリオ
14.3.7 Stryker Corporation
14.3.7.1 企業概要
14.3.7.2 製品ポートフォリオ
14.3.7.3 財務
14.3.7.4 SWOT分析
14.3.8 SureTek Medical
14.3.8.1 企業概要
14.3.8.2 製品ポートフォリオ
14.3.9 Vanguard AG
14.3.9.1 企業概要
14.3.9.2 製品ポートフォリオ
Single-use medical device reprocessing is a practice within the healthcare industry aimed at mitigating costs and reducing environmental waste by collecting, cleaning, disinfecting, and refurbishing medical devices that are designed and labeled for single-use. These devices, after appropriate processing, are then reintroduced into the medical setting for subsequent patient use. This approach has gained attention due to its potential to lower expenses associated with medical equipment procurement while also addressing concerns regarding the ecological impact of disposable medical items. The process typically involves rigorous steps to ensure the safety and efficacy of reprocessed devices. Devices are collected and sorted based on their suitability for reprocessing. They then undergo a series of meticulous procedures, including cleaning, disinfection, inspection, testing, and sterilization.
The rising prevalence of chronic disorders, along with the increasing number of surgical procedures, is driving the global market. Moreover, the growing focus on sustainability and reducing medical waste has led to increased interest in reprocessing single-use devices. Reprocessing helps minimize the environmental impact of healthcare by reducing the volume of medical waste that ends up in landfills or incinerators. Furthermore, regulatory agencies in various countries have provided guidelines and approvals for the safe reprocessing of certain single-use medical devices. These regulations support the growth of the reprocessing market by ensuring that reprocessed devices meet stringent safety and quality standards. Ongoing advancements in reprocessing technologies and techniques have improved the effectiveness and safety of the process. These advancements include better cleaning, sterilization, and quality control methods, making reprocessed devices more reliable for clinical use. Also, the establishment of standards and regulations for reprocessing single-use devices has contributed to the growth of the market. Clear guidelines provide healthcare facilities with confidence in the safety and effectiveness of reprocessed devices.
Single-Use Medical Device Reprocessing Market Trends/Drivers:
Cost Containment and Budget Pressures
In an environment of rising healthcare expenditures and financial constraints, hospitals and clinics are seeking innovative ways to maximize resource utilization without compromising patient care. Single-use medical devices are often discarded after a single patient use, leading to significant recurring expenses for replacements. Reprocessing these devices provides an avenue for substantial cost savings, as the refurbished devices can be reintroduced into the clinical setting at a fraction of the cost of new ones. This strategy not only reduces procurement expenses but also contributes to operational efficiency by curtailing the need for frequent supply replenishment. By reallocating funds saved through reprocessing to other critical areas of patient care and infrastructure enhancement, healthcare institutions can alleviate financial pressures while maintaining high standards of medical service delivery.
Environmental Sustainability and Waste Reduction
The healthcare sector generates a significant amount of medical waste, much of which comes from single-use medical devices. These disposables contribute to the accumulation of non-biodegradable materials in landfills, potentially causing environmental harm. Reprocessing offers a solution to this concern by extending the lifespan of these devices through thorough cleaning, disinfection, and sterilization. By reusing reprocessed devices, healthcare facilities can significantly decrease the volume of medical waste generated, promoting a more ecologically responsible approach to medical care. This aligns with the broader societal shift towards environmentally conscious practices and positions healthcare institutions as responsible stewards of both patient health and the environment. As regulatory bodies and patient populations increasingly prioritize sustainability, the adoption of single-use medical device reprocessing becomes a logical choice for healthcare providers looking to reduce their ecological footprint.
Regulatory Support and Technological Advancements
Regulatory agencies, recognizing the potential benefits of reprocessing when conducted with stringent quality controls, have established guidelines and standards to ensure patient safety. As these regulations evolve to ensure the efficacy of reprocessed devices, healthcare facilities are more inclined to incorporate reprocessing into their practices, augmenting the market growth. Moreover, technological advancements have transformed the reprocessing landscape. Innovations in cleaning agents, disinfection methods, and sterilization technologies have enabled more effective removal of contaminants, rendering reprocessed devices comparably safe and reliable as new ones. These advancements also contribute to enhanced quality assurance, reducing the likelihood of adverse events. The marriage of regulatory support and technological progress enhances the credibility of single-use medical device reprocessing, fostering trust among healthcare providers and encouraging broader adoption.
Single-Use Medical Device Reprocessing Industry Segmentation:
IMARC Group provides an analysis of the key trends in each segment of the global single-use medical device reprocessing market report, along with forecasts at the global, regional and country levels from 2025-2033. Our report has categorized the market based on device type, application and end user.
Breakup by Device Type:
Class I Devices
Laparoscopic Graspers
Scalpels
Tourniquet Cuffs
Other Class I Devices
Class II Devices
Pulse Oximeter Sensors
Sequential Compression Sleeves
Catheters and Guidewires
Other Class II Devices
Class II devices dominate the market
The report has provided a detailed breakup and analysis of the market based on the device type. This includes class I devices (laparoscopic graspers, scalpels, tourniquet cuffs, and other class I devices), and class II devices (pulse oximeter sensors, sequential compression sleeves, catheters and guidewires, and other class II devices). According to the report, class II devices represented the largest segment.
Class II devices encompass a diverse range of medical instruments that pose a moderate to high risk to patients. These devices often require a more complex reprocessing process due to their intricate designs, various components, and critical functionalities. Class II devices are widely utilized across multiple medical specialties, including cardiology, orthopedics, and gastroenterology. This broad usage translates into a higher volume of devices that can be targeted for reprocessing. Furthermore, the cost implications of Class II devices play a pivotal role. Several devices are expensive to procure, and their disposability contributes significantly to healthcare expenditures. As healthcare providers face mounting pressure to optimize budget allocation, the potential for cost savings through reprocessing becomes particularly attractive. The reprocessing of Class II devices offers a practical solution to mitigate financial burdens while still adhering to stringent quality and safety standards.
Breakup by Application:
General Surgery
Anesthesia
Arthroscopy and Orthopaedic Surgery
Cardiology
Gastroenterology
Gynaecology
Urology
Others
The report has provided a detailed breakup and analysis of the market based on the application. This includes general surgery, anesthesia, arthroscopy and orthopaedic surgery, cardiology, gastroenterology, gynaecology, urology, and others.
General surgery encompasses a wide array of procedures that address a range of conditions, from routine to complex. This diversity in surgical interventions contributes to the substantial size of the general surgery application segment within the reprocessing market. Single-use devices utilized in general surgery procedures, such as endoscopic tools, laparoscopic instruments, and trocars, are often costly, driving up healthcare expenditures. As hospitals and surgical centers face mounting financial pressures, reprocessing these devices becomes an attractive strategy to control costs without compromising patient safety.
On the other hand, cardiology procedures, ranging from diagnostic angiography to complex interventions, such as angioplasty and stent placement, heavily rely on a variety of single-use medical devices. These devices, often intricate and specialized, contribute to the substantial size of the cardiology application segment. The utilization of reprocessed devices in cardiology not only addresses the financial burden of procuring expensive single-use instruments but also aligns with the industry's shift towards sustainability.
Breakup by End User:
Hospitals
Ambulatory Surgical Centers
Others
Hospitals dominate the market
The report has provided a detailed breakup and analysis of the market based on the end user. This includes hospitals, ambulatory surgical centers, and others. According to the report, hospitals represented the largest segment.
Hospitals are at the forefront of sustainability efforts within the healthcare sector. With increased global awareness of environmental concerns, hospitals are under pressure to reduce their ecological footprint. Reprocessing single-use devices aligns perfectly with this sustainability objective by reducing the volume of medical waste generated. By reprocessing devices instead of disposing of them after a single use, hospitals contribute to waste reduction and minimize their impact on the environment. The adoption of reprocessed devices by hospitals also benefits from advancements in reprocessing technologies and the growing support from regulatory agencies. These factors collectively impel the credibility and safety of reprocessed devices, assuaging concerns about their efficacy. As hospitals focus to provide the best possible care to their patients, the assurance of regulatory compliance and technological sophistication plays a pivotal role in their decision to adopt reprocessed devices.
Breakup by Region:
North America
United States
Canada
Asia-Pacific
China
Japan
India
South Korea
Australia
Indonesia
Others
Europe
Germany
France
United Kingdom
Italy
Spain
Russia
Others
Latin America
Brazil
Mexico
Others
Middle East and Africa
North America exhibits a clear dominance, accounting for the largest single-use medical device reprocessing market share
The market research report has also provided a comprehensive analysis of all the major regional markets, which include North America (the United States and Canada), Asia Pacific (China, Japan, India, South Korea, Australia, Indonesia, and others), Europe (Germany, France, the United Kingdom, Italy, Spain, Russia, and others), Latin America (Brazil, Mexico, and others), and the Middle East and Africa. According to the report, North America accounted for the largest market share.
North America boasts an advanced and well-established healthcare infrastructure. The region is home to a plethora of world-renowned medical institutions, cutting-edge research centers, and innovative healthcare providers. This robust healthcare ecosystem naturally lends itself to the adoption of progressive medical practices, including the reprocessing of single-use devices. As a result, the market experiences a substantial influx of both demand and supply for reprocessed medical devices. Moreover, the stringent regulatory framework in North America serves as a catalyst for the adoption of safe and compliant reprocessing practices. Furthermore, the culture of innovation and technology adoption in North America contributes to the region's leadership in the market. Technological advancements in reprocessing techniques, sterilization methods, and quality control mechanisms are embraced more readily in this environment. Financial considerations also play a significant role in North America's dominance. The high costs associated with healthcare delivery, including the procurement of new medical devices, motivate healthcare institutions to explore cost-effective alternatives.
Competitive Landscape:
Companies are heavily investing in research and development to improve reprocessing techniques. This includes advancements in cleaning, disinfection, and sterilization methods to ensure that reprocessed devices meet or exceed regulatory requirements and maintain their safety and efficacy. Companies are also working closely with regulatory authorities to ensure that their reprocessed devices adhere to the necessary safety and quality standards. They engage in rigorous testing, validation, and documentation to demonstrate that reprocessed devices are equivalent to new ones in terms of performance and safety. Additionally, several companies are expanding their portfolios of reprocessed medical devices. Initially, the focus might have been on common devices, but as the market matures, companies are diversifying into more complex and specialized instruments used in various medical specialties. Moreover, companies are actively involved in educating healthcare professionals about the benefits and safety of reprocessed devices. This involves providing training sessions, workshops, webinars, and educational materials to ensure that healthcare providers have a clear understanding of the reprocessing process and the quality assurances in place.
The report has provided a comprehensive analysis of the competitive landscape in the market. Detailed profiles of all major companies have also been provided. Some of the key players in the market include:
Arjo Inc.
Innovative Health
Johnson & Johnson
Medline Industries LP
NEScientific Inc.
Steripro Canada
Stryker Corporation
SureTek Medical
Vanguard AG
Key Questions Answered in This Report
1. What was the size of the global single-use medical device reprocessing market in 2024?
2. What is the expected growth rate of the global single-use medical device reprocessing market during 2025-2033?
3. What are the key factors driving the global single-use medical device reprocessing market?
4. What has been the impact of COVID-19 on the global single-use medical device reprocessing market?
5. What is the breakup of the global single-use medical device reprocessing market based on the device type?
6. What is the breakup of the global single-use medical device reprocessing market based on the end user?
7. What are the key regions in the global single-use medical device reprocessing market?
8. Who are the key players/companies in the global single-use medical device reprocessing market?
1 Preface
2 Scope and Methodology
2.1 Objectives of the Study
2.2 Stakeholders
2.3 Data Sources
2.3.1 Primary Sources
2.3.2 Secondary Sources
2.4 Market Estimation
2.4.1 Bottom-Up Approach
2.4.2 Top-Down Approach
2.5 Forecasting Methodology
3 Executive Summary
4 Introduction
4.1 Overview
4.2 Key Industry Trends
5 Global Single-use Medical Device Reprocessing Market
5.1 Market Overview
5.2 Market Performance
5.3 Impact of COVID-19
5.4 Market Forecast
6 Market Breakup by Device Type
6.1 Class I Devices
6.1.1 Market Trends
6.1.2 Key Segments
6.1.2.1 Laparoscopic Graspers
6.1.2.2 Scalpels
6.1.2.3 Tourniquet Cuffs
6.1.2.4 Other Class I Devices
6.1.3 Market Forecast
6.2 Class II Devices
6.2.1 Market Trends
6.2.2 Key Segments
6.2.2.1 Pulse Oximeter Sensors
6.2.2.2 Sequential Compression Sleeves
6.2.2.3 Catheters and Guidewires
6.2.2.4 Other Class II Devices
6.2.3 Market Forecast
7 Market Breakup by Application
7.1 General Surgery
7.1.1 Market Trends
7.1.2 Market Forecast
7.2 Anesthesia
7.2.1 Market Trends
7.2.2 Market Forecast
7.3 Arthroscopy and Orthopaedic Surgery
7.3.1 Market Trends
7.3.2 Market Forecast
7.4 Cardiology
7.4.1 Market Trends
7.4.2 Market Forecast
7.5 Gastroenterology
7.5.1 Market Trends
7.5.2 Market Forecast
7.6 Gynaecology
7.6.1 Market Trends
7.6.2 Market Forecast
7.7 Urology
7.7.1 Market Trends
7.7.2 Market Forecast
7.8 Others
7.8.1 Market Trends
7.8.2 Market Forecast
8 Market Breakup by End User
8.1 Hospitals
8.1.1 Market Trends
8.1.2 Market Forecast
8.2 Ambulatory Surgical Centers
8.2.1 Market Trends
8.2.2 Market Forecast
8.3 Others
8.3.1 Market Trends
8.3.2 Market Forecast
9 Market Breakup by Region
9.1 North America
9.1.1 United States
9.1.1.1 Market Trends
9.1.1.2 Market Forecast
9.1.2 Canada
9.1.2.1 Market Trends
9.1.2.2 Market Forecast
9.2 Asia-Pacific
9.2.1 China
9.2.1.1 Market Trends
9.2.1.2 Market Forecast
9.2.2 Japan
9.2.2.1 Market Trends
9.2.2.2 Market Forecast
9.2.3 India
9.2.3.1 Market Trends
9.2.3.2 Market Forecast
9.2.4 South Korea
9.2.4.1 Market Trends
9.2.4.2 Market Forecast
9.2.5 Australia
9.2.5.1 Market Trends
9.2.5.2 Market Forecast
9.2.6 Indonesia
9.2.6.1 Market Trends
9.2.6.2 Market Forecast
9.2.7 Others
9.2.7.1 Market Trends
9.2.7.2 Market Forecast
9.3 Europe
9.3.1 Germany
9.3.1.1 Market Trends
9.3.1.2 Market Forecast
9.3.2 France
9.3.2.1 Market Trends
9.3.2.2 Market Forecast
9.3.3 United Kingdom
9.3.3.1 Market Trends
9.3.3.2 Market Forecast
9.3.4 Italy
9.3.4.1 Market Trends
9.3.4.2 Market Forecast
9.3.5 Spain
9.3.5.1 Market Trends
9.3.5.2 Market Forecast
9.3.6 Russia
9.3.6.1 Market Trends
9.3.6.2 Market Forecast
9.3.7 Others
9.3.7.1 Market Trends
9.3.7.2 Market Forecast
9.4 Latin America
9.4.1 Brazil
9.4.1.1 Market Trends
9.4.1.2 Market Forecast
9.4.2 Mexico
9.4.2.1 Market Trends
9.4.2.2 Market Forecast
9.4.3 Others
9.4.3.1 Market Trends
9.4.3.2 Market Forecast
9.5 Middle East and Africa
9.5.1 Market Trends
9.5.2 Market Breakup by Country
9.5.3 Market Forecast
10 SWOT Analysis
10.1 Overview
10.2 Strengths
10.3 Weaknesses
10.4 Opportunities
10.5 Threats
11 Value Chain Analysis
12 Porters Five Forces Analysis
12.1 Overview
12.2 Bargaining Power of Buyers
12.3 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
12.4 Degree of Competition
12.5 Threat of New Entrants
12.6 Threat of Substitutes
13 Price Analysis
14 Competitive Landscape
14.1 Market Structure
14.2 Key Players
14.3 Profiles of Key Players
14.3.1 Arjo Inc.
14.3.1.1 Company Overview
14.3.1.2 Product Portfolio
14.3.2 Innovative Health
14.3.2.1 Company Overview
14.3.2.2 Product Portfolio
14.3.3 Johnson & Johnson
14.3.3.1 Company Overview
14.3.3.2 Product Portfolio
14.3.3.3 Financials
14.3.3.4 SWOT Analysis
14.3.4 Medline Industries LP
14.3.4.1 Company Overview
14.3.4.2 Product Portfolio
14.3.4.3 SWOT Analysis
14.3.5 NEScientific Inc.
14.3.5.1 Company Overview
14.3.5.2 Product Portfolio
14.3.6 Steripro Canada
14.3.6.1 Company Overview
14.3.6.2 Product Portfolio
14.3.7 Stryker Corporation
14.3.7.1 Company Overview
14.3.7.2 Product Portfolio
14.3.7.3 Financials
14.3.7.4 SWOT Analysis
14.3.8 SureTek Medical
14.3.8.1 Company Overview
14.3.8.2 Product Portfolio
14.3.9 Vanguard AG
14.3.9.1 Company Overview
14.3.9.2 Product Portfolio
*** 医療用使い捨て器具再処理の世界市場に関するよくある質問(FAQ) ***
・医療用使い捨て器具再処理の世界市場規模は？
→IMARC社は2024年の医療用使い捨て器具再処理の世界市場規模を9億6600万米ドルと推定しています。
・医療用使い捨て器具再処理の世界市場予測は？
→IMARC社は2033年の医療用使い捨て器具再処理の世界市場規模を25億3360万米ドルと予測しています。
・医療用使い捨て器具再処理市場の成長率は？
→IMARC社は医療用使い捨て器具再処理の世界市場が2025年～2033年に年平均12.1%成長すると展望しています。
・世界の医療用使い捨て器具再処理市場における主要プレイヤーは？
→「Arjo Inc., Innovative Health, Johnson & Johnson, Medline Industries LP, NEScientific Inc., Steripro Canada, Stryker Corporation, SureTek Medical, Vanguard AGなど ...」を医療用使い捨て器具再処理市場のグローバル主要プレイヤーとして判断しています。
※上記FAQの市場規模、市場予測、成長率、主要企業に関する情報は本レポートの概要を作成した時点での情報であり、最終レポートの情報と少し異なる場合があります。
*** 免責事項 ***
https://www.globalresearch.co.jp/disclaimer/
